Turner v. United States
This text of Turner v. United States (Turner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1571
JOHN PAUL TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (MISC-02-44-7)
Submitted: June 24, 2003 Decided: July 8, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. See Turner v. United States, No. MISC-02-44-7 (W.D.
Va. Oct. 17, 2002; May 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Turner v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-united-states-ca4-2003.