Turner v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 2003
Docket03-1571
StatusUnpublished

This text of Turner v. United States (Turner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. United States, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1571

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (MISC-02-44-7)

Submitted: June 24, 2003 Decided: July 8, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders denying

his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. See Turner v. United States, No. MISC-02-44-7 (W.D.

Va. Oct. 17, 2002; May 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Turner v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-united-states-ca4-2003.