Turner v. Tuttle
1 Root 350
This text of 1 Root 350 (Turner v. Tuttle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Turner v. Tuttle, 1 Root 350 (Colo. 1792).
Opinion
Judgment — Motion insufficient, and for the plaintiff to recover. The value of public securities is considered as a matter of public notoriety, equally in the knowledge of the buyer as the seller; but the genuineness of them is not so, nor could it be found out in this case, without much time, pains and cost; the seller in such cases takes the risk upon himself and is responsible.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-tuttle-conn-1792.