Turner v. Turner

2023 Ohio 1575

Opinion

[Cite as Turner v. Turner, 2023-Ohio-1575.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JEFFREY F. TURNER, SR., :

Relator, : No. 112662 v. :

NINA TURNER, :

Respondent. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED DATED: May 5, 2023

Writ of Certiorari Order No. 564077

Appearances:

Jeffrey F. Turner, Sr., pro se.

MARY J. BOYLE, J.:

On April 28, 2023, Jeffrey F. Turner, Sr. commenced an action he

termed a writ of certiorari relating to the underlying case, Turner v. Turner,

Cuyahoga D.R. No. DR-22-388761. For the following reasons, this court dismisses

this writ action, sua sponte. First, Art. IV, § 3(B) of the Ohio Constitution vests the court of appeals

with jurisdiction over only the following five writs: quo warranto, mandamus,

habeas corpus, prohibition, and procedendo. As a corollary, this court does not have

jurisdiction to adjudicate a writ of certiorari.

Turner did not caption his case. The failure to caption a writ case

creates uncertainty as to the identity of the respondent and to the nature of the relief

sought. This court has held that this deficiency alone also warrants dismissal. State

ex rel. Calloway v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga Cty., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga

No. 71699, 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 79452 (Feb. 27, 1997); Jordan v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Court of Common Pleas, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 96013, 2011-Ohio-1813.

Moreover, it is difficult to discern what relief Turner is seeking: Does

he want this court to review the entire underlying case, does he want a review of the

October 11, 2022 hearing; does he want an order for the judge to proceed pursuant

to the judicial canons; does he want proper service for hearings; is he questioning

venue; does he want this court to vacate an order related to the October 11, 2022

hearing; does he want an investigation into the judge’s conduct; or something else.

“If a relator has failed to present clearly the claims asserted and the relief requested,

this court may enter judgment against the relator.” State v. Byrge, 8th Dist.

Cuyahoga No. 92979, 2009-Ohio-4376, ¶ 2, and State v. Wynn, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga

No. 105205, 2017-Ohio-659.

Accordingly, this court dismisses Turner’s application for a writ of

mandamus. Jeffrey F. Turner, Sr. to pay costs. This court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties notice of the judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as

required by Civ.R. 58(B).

Writ dismissed.

MARY J. BOYLE, JUDGE

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, P.J., and MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, J., CONCUR