Turner v. Torphy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Turner v. Torphy

100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 222, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 509

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 9, 1919

Docket10362

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 644 (Turner v. Torphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Torphy, 100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 222, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 509 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

In the trial court, as shown by the answer to the writ of certiorari, the evidence of the plaintiff was sufficient to have carried her case to a jury; and it was error to award a nonsuit. It was not error for the judge of the superior court to sustain the certiorari and remand the case for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur. Pond L. Lindsay, for plaintiffs in error. Quit PanTc&r, Bryan & Middlebroolcs, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ltjke, J.

In the trial court, as shown by the answer to the writ of certiorari, the evidence of the plaintiff was sufficient to have carried her case to a jury; and it was error to award a nonsuit. It was not error for the judge of the superior court to sustain the certiorari and remand the case for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur. Pond L. Lindsay, for plaintiffs in error. Quit PanTc&r, Bryan & Middlebroolcs, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 222, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-torphy-gactapp-1919.