Turner v. Superintendent, Rockbridge Regional Jail
This text of 112 F. App'x 316 (Turner v. Superintendent, Rockbridge Regional Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. Because Turner could amend the petition to clearly state the claims he wishes to raise and whether he is in custody pursuant to the relevant conviction, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appeal-able. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 892, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 F. App'x 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-superintendent-rockbridge-regional-jail-ca4-2004.