Turner v. State

1971 OK CR 23, 479 P.2d 631, 1971 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 752
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 6, 1971
DocketA-15381
StatusPublished
Cited by55 cases

This text of 1971 OK CR 23 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. State, 1971 OK CR 23, 479 P.2d 631, 1971 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 752 (Okla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Robert Lee Turner, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Oklahoma County for the offense of Grand Larceny; his punishment was fixed at four years imprisonment; and from .said judgment and sentence a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

Briefly stated, the evidence at the trial revealed that on March 17, 1964, Everett King operated a grocery store in Oklahoma City. He testified that at approximately 6:00 p. m. he was in the back of the store looking through a peep hole. He observed the defendant and a woman companion take eight cartons of cigarettes, valued at $2.90 each, and put them in a shopping cart. He continued to observe them, and saw the woman hand the cartons to the defendant who put them under his shirt. He ran to the front of the store, accosted the defendant, and called the police.

The defendant did not testify nor was any evidence offered in his behalf.

The first proposition alleges that the evidence does not support the verdict of the jury. This Court has consistently held that it is the exclusive province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts, and where the verdict is based on probable testimony, the reviewing court will not interfere with the verdict. Bryant v. State, Okl.Cr., 478 P.2d 907.

The defendant’s final proposition contends that the punishment was excessive. We need only observe that the punishment was within the range provided by law and does not shock the conscience of this Court.

*632 We are of the opinion that the judgment and sentence should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. State
1978 OK CR 58 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1978)
Munson v. State
1978 OK CR 55 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1978)
Skelton v. State
1977 OK CR 185 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1977)
Mitchell v. State
1976 OK CR 92 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Hall v. State
1976 OK CR 77 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Truelove v. State
1976 OK CR 72 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Burns v. State
1976 OK CR 69 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Gamble v. State
1976 OK CR 54 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Roland v. State
1976 OK CR 50 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Rutledge v. State
1976 OK CR 18 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Finley v. State
1976 OK CR 2 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Banks v. State
1976 OK CR 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Jones v. State
1975 OK CR 221 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)
Prevatte v. City of Tulsa
1975 OK CR 219 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)
Webb v. State
1975 OK CR 128 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)
McCoy v. State
1975 OK CR 117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)
York v. State
1975 OK CR 73 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)
Warren v. State
1975 OK CR 60 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)
Wright v. State
1975 OK CR 20 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)
Carpenter v. State
1975 OK CR 12 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1971 OK CR 23, 479 P.2d 631, 1971 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-oklacrimapp-1971.