Turner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Turner v. State

1911 OK CR 348, 115 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 603, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 296

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 23, 1911

DocketNo. A-637.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 348 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. State, 1911 OK CR 348, 115 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 603, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 296 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 20th day of December, 1909, judgment was rendered against appellant for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law of the state of Oklahoma, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150, and 60 days confinement in the county jail. At the time of rendering the judgment the court .made an ordqr requiring appellant to file his case-made and transcript of the record with the Criminal Court of Appeals within 60 days from that date., .There was no, further extension of time made by the court for perfecting the appeal in this ■ease." The 60 days allowed by the court for perfecting the.appeal in this case expired on the 18th day of February, 1910, but appellant did not file his petition in error and ease-made in this court until the 4th day of March, 1910, which was fourteen» days after the time allowed for perfecting his appeal had expired. This court, therefore, .has not acquired jurisdiction of the appeal, and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed. ' '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 20th day of December, 1909, judgment was rendered against appellant for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law of the state of Oklahoma, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150, and 60 days confinement in the county jail. At the time of rendering the judgment the court .made an ordqr requiring appellant to file his case-made and transcript of the record with the Criminal Court of Appeals within 60 days from that date., .There was no, further extension of time made by the court for perfecting the appeal in this ■ease." The 60 days allowed by the court for perfecting the.appeal in this case expired on the 18th day of February, 1910, but appellant did not file his petition in error and ease-made in this court until the 4th day of March, 1910, which was fourteen» days after the time allowed for perfecting his appeal had expired. This court, therefore, .has not acquired jurisdiction of the appeal, and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed. ' '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 348, 115 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 603, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.