Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

520 S.W.3d 820, 2017 WL 2558278, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 568

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2017·No. ED 104334·Published

Opinion

[821] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Turner (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[821] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Turner (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Turner v. State, 520 S.W.3d 820, 2017 WL 2558278, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 568 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

520 S.W.3d 820 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.