Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

520 S.W.3d 820, 2017 WL 2558278, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 568

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 13, 2017

DocketED 104334

StatusPublished

This text of 520 S.W.3d 820 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. State, 520 S.W.3d 820, 2017 WL 2558278, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 568 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[821]*821ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Turner (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[821]*821ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Turner (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 S.W.3d 820, 2017 WL 2558278, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-moctapp-2017.