Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

46 S.W.3d 667, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 2001 WL 641732

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2026 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2001·No. No. ED 78203·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Evan Turner (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal nonsupport in violation of section 568.040, RSMo 1994. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Evan Turner (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal nonsupport in violation of section 568.040, RSMo 1994. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Turner v. State, 46 S.W.3d 667, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 2001 WL 641732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

46 S.W.3d 667 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.