Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

892 S.W.2d 737, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1966, 1994 WL 705418

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1593 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1994·No. No. 65328·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Turner v. State, 892 S.W.2d 737, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1966, 1994 WL 705418 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

892 S.W.2d 737 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.