Turner v. State

171 S.E. 838, 48 Ga. App. 83, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 459

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Ga. App. 799 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 27, 1933·No. 23307·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. The excerpts from the charge to the jury on the subjects of flight and the recent possession of stolen goods were authorized by the evidence, and were not erroneous for any reason assigned.

2. Under the facts of the case, the other special assignments of error show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. Guerry, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

1. The excerpts from the charge to the jury on the subjects of flight and the recent possession of stolen goods were authorized by the evidence, and were not erroneous for any reason assigned.

2. Under the facts of the case, the other special assignments of error show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. Guerry, J., dissents.

Turner v. State, 171 S.E. 838, 48 Ga. App. 83, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 459 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

171 S.E. 838 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.