Turner v. State

137 S.E. 576, 36 Ga. App. 604, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 178
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 8, 1927
Docket17832
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 576 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. State, 137 S.E. 576, 36 Ga. App. 604, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 178 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The ground of the certiorari based upon the refusal to declare a mistrial for alleged improper remarks of the prosecuting attorney is not cause for a new trial, especially in view of the explanatory note, relating to this ground, in the judge’s answer to the certiorari.

2. None of the other special grounds of the certiorari which properly present any question for decision by this court show any reason for another trial of the case.

3. The verdict is not without evidence to support it, and the judge of the superior court properly overruled the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 576, 36 Ga. App. 604, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-gactapp-1927.