Turner v. State

45 S.E. 598, 118 Ga. 756, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 680
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 Ga. 421
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 24, 1903·Published

Opinion

Pish, P. J.

It is cause requiring the grant of a new trial for the judge, on the trial of a gaming case, when admitting to the jury evidence of the good character of the accused, to say, in effect, that while evidence of good character is admissible in all criminal cases, in his opinion it does not illustrate the issue, or amount to much, in a gaming case. Civil Code, § 4334 ; Wannaclc v. Macon, 53 Ga. 162 (3); iVcsl v. Slack, 65 Ga. 647 (2) ; Southwestern S. Co. v. Philpot, 67 Ga. 675 (8). Where, in a certiorari, error was assigned upon such intimation by the trial judge of his opinion as to the probative value of testimony, the overruling of the certiorari was erroneous.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 45 S.E. 598, 118 Ga. 756, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 680 (Ga. 1903).

45 S.E. 598 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wannack v. Mayor of Macon
53 Ga. 162 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1874)
West v. Black
65 Ga. 647 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)
Southwestern Railroad v. Papot
67 Ga. 675 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)