Turner v. State

210 So. 3d 92, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13149
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 2016·No. 2D15-480·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse Derrick Marcus Turner’s judgment and sentence for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. 1 We agree with the State’s concession that the trial court was prohibited by double jeopardy principles from setting aside the judgment of acquittal on this charge, which was entered following the close of the State’s case, and then reinstating it after the defense rested. See Smith v. Massachusetts, 543 U.S. 462, 464-75, 125 S.Ct. 1129, 160 L.Ed.2d 914 (2005).

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
1

. Turner filed a petition alleging ineffective appellate counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d), which was granted in part, and this court afforded him a new direct appeal allowing him to challenge this specific conviction only. Turner v. State, 171 So.3d 722 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (table decision).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 210 So. 3d 92, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13149 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

210 So. 3d 92 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Massachusetts
543 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 2005)