Turner v. State

951 So. 2d 1036, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4538, 2007 WL 911755
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2007
DocketNo. 4D06-2561
StatusPublished

This text of 951 So. 2d 1036 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. State, 951 So. 2d 1036, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4538, 2007 WL 911755 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Moe v. State, 944 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding the state is not required to produce the source code for the Intoxilyzer 5000 because that information is not within its possession or control).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moe v. State
944 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 So. 2d 1036, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4538, 2007 WL 911755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.