Turner v. State

739 So. 2d 148, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10054, 1999 WL 540827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 745 So. 2d 351
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1999·No. No. 99-383·Published

Opinion

■PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. As to the issue of credit for time served in Alabama awaiting extradition, the motion is successive. See Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). As to the second issue, credit for time served in Florida, the order denying relief is affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a properly pled 3.800(a) motion. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, MINER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 739 So. 2d 148, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10054, 1999 WL 540827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

739 So. 2d 148 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Prince v. State
719 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)