Turner v. State

423 So. 2d 594, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28612
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1982·No. No. 78-116·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed upon a holding that (1) the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress based on the totality of the circumstances, see Leon v. State, 410 So.2d 201 (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review denied, 417 So.2d 329 (Fla.1982); Collier v. State, 353 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); see also Michigan v. Moseley, 423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); (2) the trial court did not unduly restrict cross-examination of certain state witnesses, see Ashley v. State, 370 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and (3) the jury instructions given by the trial court when taken as a whole adequately enabled the jury to consider the theory of defense, see Scott v. State, 396 So.2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 423 So. 2d 594, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28612 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

423 So. 2d 594 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quinn v. State
662 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Parker v. State
495 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Henry v. State
445 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Leonard v. State
423 So. 2d 594 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)