Turner v. State

675 So. 2d 1362, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 361, 1995 WL 615421
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 299
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 20, 1995·No. CR-94-1682·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The petitioner, Roosevelt Turner, appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court, without making specific findings of fact required by Rule 32.9(d), held that the petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel lacked merit. The State has requested that this cause be remanded for the judge to make specific findings of fact regarding the ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The State’s request is well taken.

Therefore, we remand this cause to the trial court with instructions that the court enter specific findings of fact. A return to remand will be made with this court within 70 days of the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 675 So. 2d 1362, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 361, 1995 WL 615421 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).

675 So. 2d 1362 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.