Turner v. Savoy

D.C. Circuit

Turner v. Savoy

8 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 399, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 7, 1925

DocketNo. 4230

StatusPublished

This text of 8 F.2d 1015 (Turner v. Savoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Savoy, 8 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 399, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440 (D.C. Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, filed a bill in equity-claiming a resulting trust in a one-third interest in certain real estate in the city of Washington. The case turns wholly on issues of fact which were found by the trial justice to sustain the averments of the bill. A review of the testimony would serve no valuable purpose, since we are convinced of its sufficiency to support the decree.

The decree is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, filed a bill in equity-claiming a resulting trust in a one-third interest in certain real estate in the city of Washington. The case turns wholly on issues of fact which were found by the trial justice to sustain the averments of the bill. A review of the testimony would serve no valuable purpose, since we are convinced of its sufficiency to support the decree.

The decree is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 399, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-savoy-cadc-1925.