Turner v. Ruffin

Fourth Circuit

Turner v. Ruffin

699 F. App'x 251

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 24, 2017

DocketNo. 17-6787

StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 251 (Turner v. Ruffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Ruffin, 699 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronney Earl Turner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Ruffin, No. 1:16-cv-00510-CMH-JFA, 2017 WL 2405371 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronney Earl Turner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Ruffin, No. 1:16-cv-00510-CMH-JFA, 2017 WL 2405371 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-ruffin-ca4-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack