Turner v. Rogers

178 L. Ed. 2d 369, 131 S. Ct. 504, 562 U.S. 1002, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8485, 79 U.S.L.W. 3268
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 1, 2010
DocketNo. 10-10
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 369 (Turner v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Rogers, 178 L. Ed. 2d 369, 131 S. Ct. 504, 562 U.S. 1002, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8485, 79 U.S.L.W. 3268 (U.S. 2010).

Opinion

Motion of Larry E. Price, Sr. for leave to intervene granted. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Does the Court have jurisdiction to review the decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court?”

Same case below, 387 S.C. 142, 691 S.E.2d 470.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friedman v. Choai
S.D. New York, 2024
FRIEDMAN v. CHOAI
D. New Jersey, 2024
Bardes v. Magera
403 F. App'x 862 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 369, 131 S. Ct. 504, 562 U.S. 1002, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8485, 79 U.S.L.W. 3268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-rogers-scotus-2010.