Turner v. Power Brake & Equipment Co.
85 So. 2d 232
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Greenfield Villages, Inc., v. Thompson, Fla., 44 So.2d 679, it appearing that the appellant has an adequate remedy at law. As explained in Fair v. Tampa Electric Co., 158 Fla. 15, 27 So.2d 514, and Kellerman v. Commercial Credit Co., 138 Fla. 133, 189 So. 689, there is no time limit imposed on the motion for stay of execution provided for in Section 55.38, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Compare Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Lake County Citrus Sales, Inc., Fla., 48 So.2d 922.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. Power Brake & Equipment Co., 85 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1956).
85 So. 2d 232 (Turner v. Power Brake & Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. Grant
85 So. 2d 232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)