Turner v. Power Brake & Equipment Co.

85 So. 2d 232
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 So. 2d 232 (Turner v. Power Brake & Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Power Brake & Equipment Co., 85 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Greenfield Villages, Inc., v. Thompson, Fla., 44 So.2d 679, it appearing that the appellant has an adequate remedy at law. As explained in Fair v. Tampa Electric Co., 158 Fla. 15, 27 So.2d 514, and Kellerman v. Commercial Credit Co., 138 Fla. 133, 189 So. 689, there is no time limit imposed on the motion for stay of execution provided for in Section 55.38, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Compare Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Lake County Citrus Sales, Inc., Fla., 48 So.2d 922.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THORN-AL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. Grant
85 So. 2d 232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 So. 2d 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-power-brake-equipment-co-fla-1956.