Turner v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Turner v. Page

1966 OK CR 39, 412 P.2d 494, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 218

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 23, 1966

DocketNo. A-13827

StatusPublished

This text of 1966 OK CR 39 (Turner v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Page, 1966 OK CR 39, 412 P.2d 494, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 218 (Okla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

NIX, Judge.

This is an original proceedings for Post-Conviction Appeal filed by the petitioner, Willie Lee Turner, alleging he, was denied an appeal by the District Court of Washita County; and further, that he was coerced into entering a plea of guilty.

This Court, on November 10, 1965, ordered that the District Court of Washita County conduct an Evidentiary Hearing; make findings of fact, and return same along with the transcript of said hearing. This was done, and received in our Court on January 14, 1966.

From this record now before the Court, it is clear that petitioner’s allegations are unfounded, and we will not recite the record here.

Where the record affirmatively shows that an accused knew and understood his right to counsel and competently and intelligently waived this right and entered a plea of guilty,- with full knowledge of the consequences of such pica, the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States making obligatory the provisions of the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States upon the states, have been fully complied, with, and application for habeas corpus will be denied.

BUSSEY, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NIX, Judge.

This is an original proceedings for Post-Conviction Appeal filed by the petitioner, Willie Lee Turner, alleging he, was denied an appeal by the District Court of Washita County; and further, that he was coerced into entering a plea of guilty.

This Court, on November 10, 1965, ordered that the District Court of Washita County conduct an Evidentiary Hearing; make findings of fact, and return same along with the transcript of said hearing. This was done, and received in our Court on January 14, 1966.

From this record now before the Court, it is clear that petitioner’s allegations are unfounded, and we will not recite the record here.

Where the record affirmatively shows that an accused knew and understood his right to counsel and competently and intelligently waived this right and entered a plea of guilty,- with full knowledge of the consequences of such pica, the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States making obligatory the provisions of the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States upon the states, have been fully complied, with, and application for habeas corpus will be denied.

BUSSEY, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1966 OK CR 39, 412 P.2d 494, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-page-oklacrimapp-1966.