Turner v. Newton

272 A.D.2d 688, 708 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5494
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 688 (Turner v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Newton, 272 A.D.2d 688, 708 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of drug possession after tampered pill capsules were discovered in his cell. Upon administering a NIK test, a white powder in one of the capsules tested positive for cocaine. In our view, the misbehavior report, combined with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence supporting the charge of drug possession (see, Matter of Minton v Goord, 263 AD2d 811; Matter of Lagano v Goord, 263 AD2d 756). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the fact that the Hearing Officer chose [689]*689to credit the testimony of the pharmacist and two correction officers does not indicate bias. Any conflicting evidence created a credibility issue properly resolved by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Youngblood v Goord, 267 AD2d 640).

We also reject petitioner’s contention that he was improperly denied a copy of the hearing transcript prior to filing his administrative appeal. Respondents are not required to serve a copy of the transcript until petitioner has commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see, Matter of Rivera v Smith, 137 AD2d 281). We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied his right to call witnesses, and find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Hammock v. Keyser
201 N.Y.S.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Holmes v. Fischer
66 A.D.3d 1093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Pollard v. Duncan
274 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 688, 708 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-newton-nyappdiv-2000.