Turner v. Napolitano

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. Napolitano. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 F. Supp. 3d 115
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided October 1, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2013-0504·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RICHARD F. TURNER,

Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-504 (JEB) JANET NAPOLITANO, Sec’y, Dept. of Homeland Security,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Richard Turner filed a pro se Complaint on April 15, 2013, seeking to renounce

his citizenship. See ECF No. 1 (Complaint). Defendant moved to dismiss the case on August

13. See ECF No. 10. Two days later, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to respond to

the Motion by September 20 or risk the Court’s deeming the matter conceded. See ECF No. 11.

As Plaintiff has never responded, the Court will treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the

case without prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state.

/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: October 1, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. Napolitano, (D.D.C. 2013).

Turner v. Napolitano (Turner v. Napolitano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.