Turner v. Melony
13 Cal. 621, 1859 Cal. LEXIS 216
This text of 13 Cal. 621 (Turner v. Melony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Turner v. Melony, 13 Cal. 621, 1859 Cal. LEXIS 216 (Cal. 1859).
Opinion
Terry, C. J. concurring.
The Bespondent having been inducted into office, and his commission showing him entitled to it from the first day of January last, as Judge of the District Court, is entitled to the salary annexed to the office from that time.
The question of his eligibility cannot be tried on mandamus.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hallinan v. Mellon
218 Cal. App. 2d 342 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Klose v. Superior Court
217 P.2d 97 (California Court of Appeal, 1950)
Clark v. Murtagh
254 N.W. 54 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1934)
Elliott v. Van Delinder
247 P. 523 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
Briare v. Matthews
2 Cal. Super. Ct. 64 (California Superior Court, 1925)
James Hunter & Co. v. Truckee Lodge
14 Nev. 24 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1879)
Satterlee v. San Francisco
23 Cal. 314 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Cal. 621, 1859 Cal. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-melony-cal-1859.