Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Turner v. McNeil

Turner v. McNeil

46 So. 3d 99, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15050, 2010 WL 3894499
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 6, 2010
Docket1D10-1540
StatusPublished

This text of 46 So. 3d 99 (Turner v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. McNeil, 46 So. 3d 99, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15050, 2010 WL 3894499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David E. Turner seeks mandamus relief to compel the circuit court to rule on a petition for writ of mandamus he filed in that forum. Based on the matters shown in respondent’s response to our order to show cause, we conclude that the circuit court is taking reasonable measures to dispose of the petition below, and any delay in ruling on the matter has not been unreasonable. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. Nonetheless, we encourage the circuit court to rule on Turner’s petition as promptly as circumstances permit.

. WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carswell v. State
46 So. 3d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 So. 3d 99, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15050, 2010 WL 3894499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2010.