Turner v. McKean

21 C.M.A. 660
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided January 28, 1972·No. No. 71-49·Published

Opinion

On consideration of the “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Other Extraordinary Relief” filed in the above-entitled action, and of the pleadings filed by the parties,2 it appearing that subsequent to the filing of said Petition, the petitioners were released from confinement and placed in a status of restriction, it is, by the Court, this 28th day of January 1972,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is hereby, denied, without prejudice to the right of petitioners to raise the issues therein raised if and when the charges now pending against them are referred to a court-martial. Gale v United States, 17 USCMA 40, 37 CMR 304 (1967).

Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the Petition because in his view the relief sought therein is neither necessary nor appropriate in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article 67, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. McKean, 21 C.M.A. 660 (cma 1972).

21 C.M.A. 660 (Turner v. McKean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gale v. United States
17 C.M.A. 40 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)