Turner v. Maggio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Turner v. Maggio

108 A.D.2d 812, 485 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.2d 812 (Turner v. Maggio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Maggio, 108 A.D.2d 812, 485 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award, (1) Paul Maggio appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), entered July 20, 1983, as denied his request to recover the attorney’s fees he incurred in defending against the petitioner’s application to vacate the arbitration award and (2) the petitioner appeals from so much of the same judgment as denied her application and confirmed the arbitration award.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the issue of whether the case falls under Federal Labor Management Relations Act § 301 (29 USC § 185) was not raised before Special Term, we decline to consider it now. We find no merit in the other contentions raised. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award, (1) Paul Maggio appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), entered July 20, 1983, as denied his request to recover the attorney’s fees he incurred in defending against the petitioner’s application to vacate the arbitration award and (2) the petitioner appeals from so much of the same judgment as denied her application and confirmed the arbitration award.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the issue of whether the case falls under Federal Labor Management Relations Act § 301 (29 USC § 185) was not raised before Special Term, we decline to consider it now. We find no merit in the other contentions raised. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.2d 812, 485 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-maggio-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack