Turner v. Maeda

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JOHN TURNER, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00767-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation 5 v. [ECF No. 15] 6 PATRICK MAEDA, et al., 7 Defendants 8 9 On May 23, 2025, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I revoke plaintiff John 10 Turner’s in forma pauperis status and require him to pay the full filing fee of $405. ECF No. 37. 11 Turner did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 12 recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 13 determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14 made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15 district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16 objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 Additionally, Turner has not updated his address. See ECF No. 39 (court’s orders at ECF 18 Nos. 37, 38 returned as undeliverable). Under Local Rule IA 3-1, a “pro se party must 19 immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email 20 address, telephone number, or facsimile number.” “Failure to comply with this rule may result in 21 the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate 22 by the court.” LR IA 3-1. 23 ] I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation 2|| (ECF No. 37) is accepted. 3 I] FURTHER ORDER that by July 11, 2025, plaintiff John Turner must pay the full $405 filing fee and update his address. Failure to pay the filing fee and update his address by that date 5 will result in this case being dismissed without prejudice. 6 DATED this 11th day of June, 2025. 7 Aa 8 ANDREW P.GORDON sits 9 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23