Turner v. Lawton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Turner v. Lawton

473 So. 2d 303, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1932, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15194

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 7, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1420

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 473 So. 2d 303 (Turner v. Lawton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Lawton, 473 So. 2d 303, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1932, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, J. Ray Turner, appeals from a nonfinal order determining that the court had personal jurisdiction over the appellant. We reverse.

The appellant, a resident of South Carolina, is the president of Trayco, Inc., a South Carolina corporation doing business in the state of Florida. In addition to being one of its major stockholders, the appellant is designated administrator of Trayco’s employee profit sharing plan and profit sharing trust (pension plan). The appellee, Robert Lawton, who is a Florida resident and former employee of Trayco, Inc., brought suit against the pension plan, the corporation, and appellant individually for money allegedly owed to him under the pension plan. The summons contained in the record indicates it was to be served upon the pension plan by serving the appellant as administrator of the plan.

The appellant moved to dismiss the complaint as to him individually for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion and this interlocutory appeal timely followed.

We find that the court erred in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss. Although appellant was named individually in the complaint, the summons was served upon him as administrator of the pension plan and not in his individual capacity. Even if proper service had been made, however, there were insufficient contacts to bring appellant within the ambit of the Florida longarm statute. See § 48.193, Fla.Stat. (1983); Excel Handbag Co., Inc. v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc., 428 So.2d 348 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Bloom v. A.H. Pond Co., Inc., 519 F.Supp. 1162 (S.D.Fla.1981).

We, therefore, reverse.

REVERSED.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, J. Ray Turner, appeals from a nonfinal order determining that the court had personal jurisdiction over the appellant. We reverse.

The appellant, a resident of South Carolina, is the president of Trayco, Inc., a South Carolina corporation doing business in the state of Florida. In addition to being one of its major stockholders, the appellant is designated administrator of Trayco’s employee profit sharing plan and profit sharing trust (pension plan). The appellee, Robert Lawton, who is a Florida resident and former employee of Trayco, Inc., brought suit against the pension plan, the corporation, and appellant individually for money allegedly owed to him under the pension plan. The summons contained in the record indicates it was to be served upon the pension plan by serving the appellant as administrator of the plan.

The appellant moved to dismiss the complaint as to him individually for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion and this interlocutory appeal timely followed.

We find that the court erred in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss. Although appellant was named individually in the complaint, the summons was served upon him as administrator of the pension plan and not in his individual capacity. Even if proper service had been made, however, there were insufficient contacts to bring appellant within the ambit of the Florida longarm statute. See § 48.193, Fla.Stat. (1983); Excel Handbag Co., Inc. v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc., 428 So.2d 348 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Bloom v. A.H. Pond Co., Inc., 519 F.Supp. 1162 (S.D.Fla.1981).

We, therefore, reverse.

REVERSED.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 So. 2d 303, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1932, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-lawton-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack