Turner v. Lawley

252 N.E.2d 855, 25 N.Y.2d 963, 305 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1038
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 1969·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[965]*965Memorandum. Notwithstanding our decision in Matter of Gaines v. Board of Election (25 N Y 2d 807), we adhere to the long-established substantial compliance rule announced in Matter of Simpson v. Cohen (275 N. Y. 642) and reaffirmed in Matter of De Luca v. McNab (16 N Y 2d 835). (See, also, Matter of Rosen v. McNab, 25 N Y 2d 798.) To whatever extent our decision in Gaines is inconsistent with the result herein, it is hereby overruled.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and the order of Special Term reinstated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. Lawley, 252 N.E.2d 855, 25 N.Y.2d 963, 305 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1038 (N.Y. 1969).

252 N.E.2d 855 (Turner v. Lawley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braxton v. Mahoney
104 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Sheehan v. Scaringe
121 Misc. 2d 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Higby v. Mahoney
396 N.E.2d 183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Denn v. Mahoney
52 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Talbot v. Mahoney
52 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)