Turner v. Lawley
This text of 252 N.E.2d 855 (Turner v. Lawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[965]*965Memorandum. Notwithstanding our decision in Matter of Gaines v. Board of Election (25 N Y 2d 807), we adhere to the long-established substantial compliance rule announced in Matter of Simpson v. Cohen (275 N. Y. 642) and reaffirmed in Matter of De Luca v. McNab (16 N Y 2d 835). (See, also, Matter of Rosen v. McNab, 25 N Y 2d 798.) To whatever extent our decision in Gaines is inconsistent with the result herein, it is hereby overruled.
Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson concur.
Order reversed, without costs, and the order of Special Term reinstated in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 N.E.2d 855, 25 N.Y.2d 963, 305 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-lawley-ny-1969.