Turner v. Langdon

112 Mass. 265
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 112 Mass. 265 (Turner v. Langdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Langdon, 112 Mass. 265 (Mass. 1873).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The practice act allows a count on an account annexed to be used whenever the cause of action would be correctly described by any of the common counts at common law. Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 2, cl. 7. Goods bargained and sold is one of the common counts. Stearns v. Washburn, 7 Gray, 187. The time of payment having expired before the bringing of this action, the facts which must have been found by the jury under the instructions of the court would have supported an action for goods bargained and sold. Hall v. Miller, Quincy, 252. Brooke v. White, 1 N. R. 330. Kymer v. Suwercropp, 1 Camp. 109. Middlesex Co. v. Osgood, 4 Gray, 447. Morse v. Sherman, 106 Mass. 430. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. Standard Worsted Co.
43 N.E. 112 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Folsom v. Cornell
22 N.E. 705 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Frazier v. Simmons
2 N.E. 112 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 Mass. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-langdon-mass-1873.