Turner v. Langdon

112 Mass. 265
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The practice act allows a count on an account annexed to be used whenever the cause of action would be correctly described by any of the common counts at common law. Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 2, cl. 7. Goods bargained and sold is one of the common counts. Stearns v. Washburn, 7 Gray, 187. The time of payment having expired before the bringing of this action, the facts which must have been found by the jury under the instructions of the court would have supported an action for goods bargained and sold. Hall v. Miller, Quincy, 252. Brooke v. White, 1 N. R. 330. Kymer v. Suwercropp, 1 Camp. 109. Middlesex Co. v. Osgood, 4 Gray, 447. Morse v. Sherman, 106 Mass. 430. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. Langdon, 112 Mass. 265 (Mass. 1873).

112 Mass. 265 (Turner v. Langdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. Standard Worsted Co.
43 N.E. 112 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Folsom v. Cornell
22 N.E. 705 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Frazier v. Simmons
2 N.E. 112 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)