Turner v. King

79 A.D.2d 654, 433 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14021
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the petitioner father, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 27, 1979, as ordered that his daughter shall not be forced to visit with him, unless she so elects. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, the second and third decretal paragraphs are deleted therefrom, and the matter is remitted to Special Term for a hearing on the issue of visitation by the father, which shall be presided over by another Justice. It was inappropriate for the court to deprive the father of all his visitation rights based solely on a conference with the daughter (cf. Obey v Degling, 37 NY2d 768, 771). Under the circumstances of this case, the parties should have been given the opportunity to present evidence on the issue of visitation in open court (cf. Matter of Lincoln v Lincoln, 24 NY2d 270; Heely v Heely, 69 AD2d 810). We also note that the issue of the mother’s contempt for failure to comply with certain prior judgments is not properly before us (see CPLR 5501, subd [a], par 1). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. King, 79 A.D.2d 654, 433 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

79 A.D.2d 654 (Turner v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Damien X.
217 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Meisner v. Meisner
111 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)