Turner v. Kelley
This text of 91 S.E.2d 356 (Turner v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
.'Unless the-,plaintiff -is- a person- authorizied-to institute this proceeding under the land-registration.act-'of 1937, it,is,:settled'foy..,'the.d'ediáions‘-of'.this,-.coui’t that this entire proceeding is a nullity. To all civil actions brought in the courts of this State there must be a proper party plaintiff and a proper party defendant. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Inman Park Presbyterian Church, 111 Ga. 677 (36 S. E. 880); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Dalton Marble Works, 122 Ga. 774. (50 S. E. 978). .e^tipjg;ppl^iptjff,tp piro.q&qdjpgs,brought under,this:.act, -■.Code .§¡’60-203-.declares: (iSuit Tor-registration of-Title shall be 'hégúh by "a petition to the:'court by 'the ‘person’ br'persqn's or corporation claiming,' .singly)piy'cpÍÍ^cíiy.ely,; t9¡pyn,ór;,tp,Iíiaye the power of appointing or disposingof >a-n. estate ini-fee simples in-any land, whether SubjectTo- liens; encumbiances; Or-lesser estate, or ■notTiTAnd ©ode §■'60-205-'-provides:■■‘•‘The petition Shall: include as defendants all persons who1 by the''petition- aré «'disclosed To ■have any.-interest,'-equity)*or'claim.-adverse'To the-petitioner or otherwise/ vested or -contingent; «upon' said'-land--or any interest -■tliéfein) and shall-also'! incliidé as. dfe-fendhntS'alb'other-persons -whomut'-rhay cpneem.''-’5Tn- his work’ on-Land-Registration,- Judge ■■Powell-sáid-.(pk32,A§-27).:'-“Not only ¡the owner of a'-fee-simple '¡estate sis ¡ a1-proper ¡applicant for th© registration of land] «but such .'■aixiapplication'may¡bemade by anytpersori. or¡pérsons or¡c6rpora■tidns'claiming.singly or Collectively I-'-.'-To have'-the power ' of'appointing! or disposing;of ato-estatein fee.simple.-1!-Hence any ' ond .'who,'has 'been-.grantedThe power! of! appointment/ by deed= or will, as-to-such an-estate-may-cause;the land to-be--registered, at 1 any Time, prior-To -the-.app'dintm'ent ¡taking; effect: Likewise, any ' trustee:1 (ihcludihg.au executor! who-'is the donee- of«ai power of sale '•und.er'Thé will) upon whom the-power; of-sélling The ¿feeds con-:f erred maiy.cause'the land to'be registered;, .’.- .When a trustee 'holds The title buthasn’ocpower-t© sell j ¡.the «cestui 'qué trust -.should *177 ■join in the application:'' However;■ a p'owef to sell1 is-’sufficient to authorize' the application! though it is riot "a. power!to'‘sell at a ¡private sale.” , In this-ease.the record, affirmatively .shpws.that the ápplicant for registration’'does’not-own-'-the la!nds-‘involved,-and unless he, as 'ádiriiriistfator; had tile power 'of 'disposing! of them -in fee simple, he. was ¡wholly withput authority to institute, this proceeding and'it-is'a'nullityU “Upon the death of the!owner of ah' bstáté'in reklty/which estkte’sufvivee.hini', ’the.title 'shall vest • ijnmediately in,his hpirs at-,law, subject.tq.be..administered ,by, the legal representative,-if there-is< one,--for ¡the-payment.-of debts-and 'the purposes of distribution.” - Code §’113-901. Before an adfninistrator can sell the lands of his intestate for either of both of - the •mentioned purposes,-.he must by written petition- apply, to "the court of- ordinary for leave tó do so, sbttiri'g-foith'in 'the'petition the reason for such application; and notice,of his application must ■be: published once.a week for four weeks ¡before the,hearing, in the ’ri'ewépáper in which’the' ebürity’&dvertiséments’ are!'püb'lishéd.-: If no objection to. such sale is filed and .the' ordinary !js' satisfied of the truth of. the allegation.of the.petition,, an, order shall .be passed granting leave orpowerto sell. ■' Oode!§T13-1706T In this1 case the record does.not show that the plainti'ffib’s^süch'a'dMiníkfktór, has applied for or. obtained leave or power.,.to .sell .the.iands ,of .his intestate for any purpose-from- the court .of ordinary. Hence, it must be heldthat/he did,,hdt 'haYé'the’piówerbf disposing bf his intestate.’s lands,-jp.. fee simple when, this ,prpcee4ing was inqtikited; ■and, since the-proceeding is-.a-nullity; it should 'have been dismissed on the'déferidarit’s mbtiori'. '■''■ '' ' ' - ■■■ •
tydgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E.2d 356, 212 Ga. 175, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-kelley-ga-1956.