Turner v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Turner v. Johnson

466 F. App'x 214

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2012·No. No. 11-7504·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. Turner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Johnson, No. 1:11—cv-01086-CMH-TCB (E.D.Va. Oct. 21, 2011). See Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 1139-40 (9th Cir.2005) (holding Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), applies to civilly committed sex offenders). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. Turner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Johnson, No. 1:11—cv-01086-CMH-TCB (E.D.Va. Oct. 21, 2011). See Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 1139-40 (9th Cir.2005) (holding Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), applies to civilly committed sex offenders). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Turner v. Johnson, 466 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

466 F. App'x 214 (Turner v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related