Turner v. Holleran

11 Minn. 253
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 15, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 11 Minn. 253 (Turner v. Holleran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Holleran, 11 Minn. 253 (Mich. 1866).

Opinion

By the Gowrt

Wilson, Ch. J.

The appeal in this case, from the assessment made by the commissioners, only brought before the District Court, the question as to the propriety of [255]*255the amount of damages awarded to the parties whose lands were overflowed. Comp Stat. 818, -Secs. 10 and 13. That court, therefore, was right in denying the motion to set aside the order appointing commissioners.

But aside from this objection, the appeal must be dismissed, for the reason that the order appealed from is not appealable. It can only be claimed that an appeal from this order is authorized by the 6th Sub. of Sec. 11, Chap. Yl, Comp. Stats., which provides that an appeal may be taken from a final order affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding. No legal question involved in the proceeding was definitely settled, nor was any substantial right of any of the parties affected by the order appealed from. The proceeding still remained pending in the court, and the right to review all the questions involved was unimpaired by the decision of said motion. The final order mentioned in this section refers to final orders in the nature of judgments, and if it is admitted that an appeal lies in such cases, it only lies alter the entry of judgment, where both the judgment and intermediate order are open for review.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Kay
107 F. Supp. 895 (S.D. Iowa, 1952)
City of Eufaula v. Ahrens
159 P. 327 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Myers v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
91 N.W. 1076 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
B. & O. Railroad v. P. W. & Ky. Railroad
17 W. Va. 812 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
Boom Co. v. Patterson
98 U.S. 403 (Supreme Court, 1879)
Rippe v. Chicago, Dubuque & Minnesota Railroad
20 Minn. 187 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1873)
Warren v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
18 Minn. 384 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1872)
Harding v. Funk
8 Kan. 315 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Minn. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-holleran-minn-1866.