Turner v. Green & Johnson
This text of 24 F. Cas. 355 (Turner v. Green & Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But
(nem. con.) rejected the evidence. He then offered to prove that the defendant, Johnson, confessed a balance of $300 due on the note, and promised to pay it; and contended that this was good evidence on the count for money had and received.
But the Court
rejected the evidence.
The Court offered to save the point, and directed the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the Court on the question of evidence, but Mr. Marbury refused to pay the jury fee ; and the Court instructed the jury that there was no evidence before them to support the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F. Cas. 355, 2 D.C. 202, 2 Cranch 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-green-johnson-circtddc-1820.