Turner v. Georgia-Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Turner v. Georgia-Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

120 S.E. 37, 31 Ga. App. 111, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 758

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 13, 1923

Docket14784

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 37 (Turner v. Georgia-Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Georgia-Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 120 S.E. 37, 31 Ga. App. 111, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 758 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

This was a suit for the breach of a contract of employment, and the only issue raised by the pleadings was whether the plaintiff was discharged by the defendant, the plaintiff contending that he was wrongfully discharged, and the defendant contending that the plaintiff had not been discharged but had voluntarily quit his position. Under these facts it was reversible error for the court to charge as complained of in grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for a new trial. It follows that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Jones & Jones, for plaintiff. J. F. Hatchett, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bboyles, C. J.

This was a suit for the breach of a contract of employment, and the only issue raised by the pleadings was whether the plaintiff was discharged by the defendant, the plaintiff contending that he was wrongfully discharged, and the defendant contending that the plaintiff had not been discharged but had voluntarily quit his position. Under these facts it was reversible error for the court to charge as complained of in grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for a new trial. It follows that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Jones & Jones, for plaintiff. J. F. Hatchett, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 37, 31 Ga. App. 111, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-georgia-alabama-coca-cola-bottling-co-gactapp-1923.