Turner v. Fuller
146 S.E. 494, 39 Ga. App. 184, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 242
Opinion
The petition in this case showing affirmatively on its face that the plaintiff would in no event be entitled to recover, the exception to the verdict, based upon the ground that it was contrary to law and the evidence, and without evidence to support it, must be sustained. See Greeson v. Bailey, 167 Ga. 638 (146 S. E. 490) ; Gunn v. Johnson, 29 Ga. App. 610 (116 S. E. 921); New Zealand Fire Ins. Co. v. Brewer, 29 Ga. App. 733 (6, 7) (116 S. E. 922).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. Fuller, 146 S.E. 494, 39 Ga. App. 184, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 242 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
146 S.E. 494 (Turner v. Fuller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simmons v. Noble
65 S.E.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Powers v. Wren
31 S.E.2d 713 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Summers v. Barron
200 S.E. 228 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Huson v. Farmer
185 S.E. 119 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Braselton v. Brazell
175 S.E. 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)