Turner v. EVTAC MINING

724 N.W.2d 14
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 22, 2006
DocketA006-1195
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 724 N.W.2d 14 (Turner v. EVTAC MINING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. EVTAC MINING, 724 N.W.2d 14 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

724 N.W.2d 14 (2006)

Steven R. TURNER, Relator,
v.
EVTAC MINING, and CNA ClaimsPlus, Respondents, and
Iron Range Rehab Center, and Orthopaedic Associates of Duluth, P.A., Intervenors.

No. A006-1195.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

November 22, 2006.

Diana L. Brennan, Brennan Law Office, Inver Grove Hts., MN, for Relator.

Thomas F. Coleman, Cousineau McGuire Chartered, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

ORDER

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Associate Justice.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 25, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Nolen
724 N.W.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 N.W.2d 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-evtac-mining-minn-2006.