Turner v. Enzler

D.C. Circuit

Turner v. Enzler

712 F. App'x 12

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 2018

DocketNo. 17-7053

StatusPublished

This text of 712 F. App'x 12 (Turner v. Enzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Enzler, 712 F. App'x 12 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 21, 2017, be affirmed. The district court correctly held that no reasonable jury could find that appellee Catholic Charities’ legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for terminating appellant’s employment was pretextual and that Catholic Charities discriminated against her on the basis of race or age. See, e.g., Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 496 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 21, 2017, be affirmed. The district court correctly held that no reasonable jury could find that appellee Catholic Charities’ legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for terminating appellant’s employment was pretextual and that Catholic Charities discriminated against her on the basis of race or age. See, e.g., Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 496 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 F. App'x 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-enzler-cadc-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack