Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.

222 A.D. 826

Opinion

— Order denying defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to elect and to serve an amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Subdivision 9, section 258 of the Civil Practice Act does not differ in its effect from subdivision 9, section 484 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as construed by the cases (Carmody’s New York Practice, §§ 170, 180 et seq.), and, therefore, Reed v. Livermore (101 App. Div. 254) is decisive of the question herein. Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co., 222 A.D. 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

222 A.D. 826 (Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. Livermore
101 A.D. 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)