Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.
This text of 222 A.D. 826 (Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order denying defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to elect and to serve an amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Subdivision 9, section 258 of the Civil Practice Act does not differ in its effect from subdivision 9, section 484 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as construed by the cases (Carmody’s New York Practice, §§ 170, 180 et seq.), and, therefore, Reed v. Livermore (101 App. Div. 254) is decisive of the question herein. Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-edison-storage-battery-co-nyappdiv-1928.