TURNER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
This text of TURNER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (TURNER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATHANIEL TURNER, : Plaintiff, : v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-CV-0491 DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, et al, : Defendants. :
ORDER AND NOW, this / ) of May, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Nathaniel Turner’s pro se Complaint (ECF No. 1) it is ORDERED that: 1. The Complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons in the Court’s Memorandum as follows: a. All claims related to Mr. Turner’s claim of failure to turn over exculpatory evidence are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Mr. Turner may reassert his Heck barred claims only in the event his underlying sentence is reversed, vacated, or otherwise invalidated; and b. All remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for all purposes, including statistics. BY THE URT: cai.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
TURNER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-district-attorney-philadelphia-county-paed-2022.