Turner v. Crebill

Ohio Supreme Court

Turner v. Crebill

1 Ohio 373

DecidedDecember 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio 373 (Turner v. Crebill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Crebill, 1 Ohio 373 (Ohio 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

"We can not doubt but that the decree made in Hamilton county in September, 1808, was a final decree between the parties to it.

The subsequent orders were such as are usually made to give effect to a final decree, and can not lead to a conclusion that any of the original matters litigated in the suit were still open to be decided.

It is well settled that a final decree is not notice to a purchaser. It is not pretended that the purchaser had actual notice.

The bill of review must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

"We can not doubt but that the decree made in Hamilton county in September, 1808, was a final decree between the parties to it.

The subsequent orders were such as are usually made to give effect to a final decree, and can not lead to a conclusion that any of the original matters litigated in the suit were still open to be decided.

It is well settled that a final decree is not notice to a purchaser. It is not pretended that the purchaser had actual notice.

The bill of review must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ohio 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-crebill-ohio-1824.