Turner v. Cotton, County Judge

57 S.W. 35, 93 Tex. 559, 1900 Tex. LEXIS 182
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMay 21, 1900
DocketNo. 914.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 57 S.W. 35 (Turner v. Cotton, County Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Cotton, County Judge, 57 S.W. 35, 93 Tex. 559, 1900 Tex. LEXIS 182 (Tex. 1900).

Opinion

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for the writ of mandamus to the County Judge of Hamilton County. Article 946 of the Revised Statutes provides that this court may issue writs of "mandamus against any district judge or officer of the State Government, except the Governor of the State.” In Travis County v. Jourdan, 91 Texas, 217, is was held that county officers, though officers of the State in a certain sense, are not "officers of the State Government” within the meaning of the provision quoted. The writ in that case was sought against a county treasurer. If the county treasurer be not an "officer of the State Government” in the sense of those terms as used in the statute, neither is a county judge. It follows that we are without the power to issue the writ prayed for in this case, and therefore the petition is dismissed.

Petition for mandamus dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cocke v. Smith
179 S.W.2d 954 (Texas Supreme Court, 1944)
Lafield v. Maryland Casualty Co.
33 S.W.2d 187 (Texas Supreme Court, 1930)
Conroy v. Hallowell
144 N.W. 895 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.W. 35, 93 Tex. 559, 1900 Tex. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-cotton-county-judge-tex-1900.