Turner v. Coolidge

43 Mass. 350
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Mass. 350 (Turner v. Coolidge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Coolidge, 43 Mass. 350 (Mass. 1841).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The general rule is, that the sale of a vessel abroad is good, provided possession be taken within a reasonable time after her return.

We are strongly inclined to the opinion, that the possession of one part owner, who acts for himself, and, at the request of the other part owner, acts for him, supersedes the necessity of a formal taking of possession, and vests the property in the vendee.

But without deciding the case on that ground, it is impossible to distinguish this case from that of Joy v. Sears, 9 Pick. 4. Under the circumstances of the case, as agreed, laches is not "mputable to the plaintiff, Merrill. No unreasonable time had elapsed, when the attachment was made, and therefore the vessel was not liable to be attached as the property of Staples, the former owner.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Mass. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-coolidge-mass-1841.