Turner v. Clay
397 U.S. 39, 25 L. Ed. 2d 40, 90 S. Ct. 814, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 2934
Opinion
TURNER ET AL.
v.
CLAY ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Harry M. Lightsey, Jr., for appellants.
Huger Sinkler for Clay et al., and Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. Clay, 397 U.S. 39, 25 L. Ed. 2d 40, 90 S. Ct. 814, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 2934 (1970).
397 U.S. 39 (Turner v. Clay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Opinion No. (1996)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1996
Opinion of the Justices
468 So. 2d 883 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
William C. Hall, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. O. Frank Thornton, Secretary of State for the State of South Carolina
445 F.2d 834 (Fourth Circuit, 1971)
Gordon v. Lance
403 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Tiews v. Timberlane Regional School District
273 A.2d 680 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1971)
Brenner v. School District of Kansas City, Missouri
315 F. Supp. 627 (W.D. Missouri, 1970)