Turner v. City of New York
297 A.D.2d 285, 745 N.Y.2d 921, 745 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7815
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 290 A.D.2d 336 →
Opinion
[286]*286The jury determination that the defendants were negligent, but that their negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident, was not inconsistent (see Campbell v Crimi, 267 AD2d 343; Gomez v Park Donuts, 249 AD2d 266; Miglino v Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 243 AD2d 451, 452). In addition, the verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. City of New York, 297 A.D.2d 285, 745 N.Y.2d 921, 745 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 285 (Turner v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Miglino v. Supermarkets General Corp.
243 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Gomez v. Park Donuts, Inc.
249 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Campbell v. Crimi
267 A.D.2d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)