Turner v. City of Hazelwood

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. City of Hazelwood

559 S.W.3d 927

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 30, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106387

StatusPublished

This text of 559 S.W.3d 927 (Turner v. City of Hazelwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. City of Hazelwood, 559 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Niesha Turner ("Plaintiff"), as mother and next friend of Chanze Desean Jones, appeals the trial court's judgment granting the City of Hazelwood, C. Nathan Haase, Matthew Mankus, and Joseph Kohnen's (collectively "Defendants") joint motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's negligence *928claims. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Niesha Turner ("Plaintiff"), as mother and next friend of Chanze Desean Jones, appeals the trial court's judgment granting the City of Hazelwood, C. Nathan Haase, Matthew Mankus, and Joseph Kohnen's (collectively "Defendants") joint motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's negligence *928claims. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.W.3d 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-city-of-hazelwood-moctapp-2018.